Best Free Stock Image Websites (2026): Licenses, Video, Vectors

You’re building a slide deck, a landing page, or a social campaign. You need visuals fast. You also don’t want the glossy, fake “corporate handshake” photos that scream template. In this article, we’ll share the best free stock image websites (2026): top licenses, video, and vectors included.

Free stock libraries can solve the cost problem, but they don’t automatically solve the quality, representation, or licensing problem. The difference between a good free image source and a risky one is usually: how consistently it delivers usable images, and how clearly it explains what you’re allowed to do with them.

Criteria for picking a free image site

Use these filters before you commit a library to your workflow:

• Visual quality: Resolution, lighting, composition, “real” moments vs staged poses.
• Variety and diversity: Range of people, cultures, ages, body types, contexts, and non-stereotyped scenes.
• Licensing clarity: Is commercial use allowed? Are there limits on redistribution, merch, or use with logos/people?
• Search and download speed: Filters, collections, related images, and frictionless downloads.
• Asset types: Photos only vs photos + video + illustrations/vectors.
• Consistency: Does the site stay strong after page one of results?

Top websites for free stock photos (and what they’re actually good for)

1) Unsplash

Modern, polished photography with a huge catalog—good for web headers, editorial-style layouts, and minimalist brand visuals.

Strengths

• Large library with strong aesthetic consistency
• Great for “hero” images and modern backgrounds
• Smooth browsing and discovery

Weaknesses

• Some categories drift into sameness (same poses, same lighting)
• Representation varies by topic
• Licensing is straightforward at a high level, but still requires common-sense checks for people/logos

2) Pexels

A practical all-rounder: solid photos plus a lot of usable free video, which matters if you’re producing ads or social.

Strengths

• Strong mix of photos and video
• Generally natural-looking imagery
• Fast search and clean filters

Weaknesses

• Depth can be thin in niche categories
• “Recommended attribution” can confuse teams with strict compliance habits

3) Pikwizard

My personal choice. A straightforward source for free photos and video that’s built for quick marketing use—useful when you need “good enough” fast without endless scrolling.

Strengths

• Photo + video options in one place
• Simple browsing for campaign-style needs
• Helpful when you need alternatives to the same images circulating on bigger libraries

Weaknesses

• As with any free library, license details and edge cases depend on the specific asset
• Category depth may not match the largest platforms

4) Pixabay Best Free Stock Image Websites

High volume across multiple asset types (photos, illustrations, vectors, video). Useful when you need breadth more than taste.

Strengths

• One-stop shop for mixed media
• Lots of assets for common business needs
• Easy downloading and broad usage allowances (still read the license page)

Weaknesses

• Quality is uneven; more “generic stock” appears
• Some assets look overused or dated

5) Noun Project (photos + icons)

If you care about representation and purposeful creative choices, Noun Project is a strong option—especially combined with its icon ecosystem for consistent design systems.

Strengths

• Mission-driven, design-forward approach
• Strong pairing of photography with icons for brand consistency
• Good for teams building repeatable visual language

Weaknesses

• Free use may require attribution depending on asset and plan
• Some content sits behind paid tiers

6) Nappy Best Free Stock Image Websites

If you keep seeing the same narrow depiction of “professional” or “lifestyle,” Nappy is a corrective: it centers Black and Brown communities in a way mainstream libraries often don’t.

Strengths

• More authentic representation in a space that often fails at it
• High-quality portraits and lifestyle imagery
• Clear purpose: diversity without tokenism

Weaknesses

• Smaller library than mainstream platforms
• Some niches won’t have multiple variations

7) Stocksy (not primarily free)

Not a free-first site, but relevant if you’re tired of the free-stock look and need premium, editorial-grade imagery.

Strengths

• Highly curated, distinctive photography
• Strong for brand campaigns and product storytelling
• Better odds of finding images that don’t look recycled

Weaknesses

• Mostly paid licensing
• Not ideal if your workflow depends on zero-cost assets

Comparison table (commercial use, attribution, video, vectors, editorial limits)

Site	Commercial use	Attribution	Video	Vectors	Editorial limits / sensitive-use limits
Unsplash	Allowed for commercial + non-commercial.	Not required (appreciated).	No (photo-focused).	No (photo-focused).	Editorial use is allowed; still avoid resale/competing-library behavior and other prohibited uses.
Pexels	Allowed for personal + commercial.	Not required.	Yes.	No (photos/videos).	No “bad light/offensive” portrayal, no implied endorsement, no redistribution, no using as a trademark.
Pixabay	Allowed (with notable restrictions).	Not required (appreciated).	Yes.	Yes (vectors + illustrations).	Strong restriction: if content includes recognizable trademarks/logos/brands, you can’t use it commercially “in relation to goods/services,” including printing on merchandise.
Pikwizard	Free license permits personal + commercial use, but with brand/logo and sensitive-use restrictions.	Not required (encouraged; and specific credit language may apply in some production contexts).	Yes (images + videos).	No dedicated vectors; has PNGs/templates instead.	Explicit: avoid commercial advertising use where identifiable brand names/logos/copyrighted material appear; editorial use is generally OK for newsworthy purposes. Also bans template/standalone background resale patterns.
Noun Project	Free tier: no commercial photo use. Paid photos/icons: royalty-free commercial license.	Free tier: attribution required. Paid: no attribution required.	No (not a footage library).	Yes (PNG/SVG icons).	Free tier blocks commercial photo use; commercial workflows require subscription or per-asset licensing.
Nappy	CC0: commercial + personal use allowed.	Not required (credits encouraged).	No (photos).	No (photos).	Don’t repost to other stock sites, don’t resell without significant modification, don’t degrade subjects.
Stocksy	Paid; standard license covers advertising/editorial/promotional (print cap noted), with add-ons for expanded usage.	Not required (paid licensing).	Yes (photo + video).	No vectors focus; has illustrations.	Standard license includes advertising/editorial; “Products for resale” is a distinct add-on category (merch/templates/apps/etc.).

The licensing reality (what teams get wrong)

“Free to download” is not the same as “safe for any use.”

Run this checklist on any image you plan to use publicly:

• Recognizable people: ads and endorsements are where problems happen; be conservative.
• Logos and trademarks: remove/avoid branded elements unless you’re sure it’s permitted.
• Private property/interiors: unique locations can introduce separate rights issues.
• Redistribution: many licenses prohibit repackaging images as your own stock collection or template product.
• Recordkeeping: save the asset page URL and license terms at the time you downloaded.

Best free stock image websites: Quick workflow that avoids most mistakes

1. Search in two libraries (one “big,” one “specialized”) to avoid same-image fatigue.
2. Filter for orientation and resolution first; style second.
3. Reject images with visible logos, obvious brand marks, or sensitive contexts.
4. Save source links + license notes in a spreadsheet or project doc.
5. Standardize attribution rules internally (even if optional) to prevent inconsistency.